Bosch PL1632 vs DeWalt D26676: Which One is For You?

Bosch PL1632 vs DeWalt D26676… In this report, we compare two hand planer models from two industry giants. Both hand planers have been given topnotch rating on a popular online retailer, but which one is for you? Read on to find out.

Comparison Chart: Bosch PL1632 vs DeWalt D26676

Let’s start with this chart.

Hand Planers
Model Check Price » Bosch PL1632 Check Price » DeWalt D26676
Amperage 6.5 5.5
Planing Depth 1/16″ (1.5mm) 1/16″ (1.5mm)
Planing Width 3-1/4″ 3-1/4″
No-Load RPM 16,500 17,000
Weight 6.3 lbs. 6.0 lbs.
Dust Port Shape Round Irregular
Rabbet Depth 5/16″ 23/64″
Aluminum Front and Back Shoes
Machined Groove
Kickstand
Poly-V Drive Belt
Includes Blades
Includes a Guide Fence
Includes Shoe Cover for Fence
Includes a Shavings Bag
Includes a Blade / Socket Wrench
Includes a Blade Depth Setting Gauge
Includes a Blade Resharpening Tool

Key Differences

As you can see in the chart above, these hand planers share a lot of common specs and features. For instance, they both have the same maximum planing depth and width. Also, their shoes are made of aluminum. But they’re different in certain aspects, and we list down these differences below.

Also Read: Bosch JS365 vs DeWalt DW331K Jig Saw Comparison Report

Amperage

Based on amperage data, the Bosch PL1632‘s motor can effectively cool itself more than the DeWalt.

Weight

The DeWalt D26676 is lighter than the Bosch. It weighs 6.0 lbs. In comparison, the PL1632 weighs 6.3 lbs.

Dust Port Shape

The Bosch PL1632 wins in this area. It has a round-shaped dust port, which allows you to easily attach a shop-vac. The DeWalt’s port is irregularly shaped.

Included Items

Some items included with the DeWalt are not present with the Bosch, and vice-versa. For instance, the DeWalt has a blade resharpening tool, but the Bosch does not. The Bosch has a shavings bag, but the DeWalt does not.

Also Read: DeWalt DW317K vs DW331K: What’s the Difference?

Our Final Word: Bosch PL1632 vs DeWalt D26676

Which of these hand planers is for you?

As you can see, both of these tools have things to offer that the other doesn’t. So it’s all about preference, depending on what features you find important.

Makita KP0800K vs KP0810 Hand Planer Comparison Report

Makita KP0800K vs KP0810… As advertised, these hand planers “deliver power, cutting capacity, and ease of use.” But what’s their difference? Find out in this comparison report.

Comparison Chart: Makita KP0800K vs KP0810

Let’s start with this chart.

Hand Planer
Model Check Price » Makita KP0800K Check Price » Makita KP0810
Amps 6.5 7.5
Planing Width 3-1/4″ 3-1/4″
Planing Depth 3/32″ 5/32″
No Load Speed 17,000 RPM 16,000 RPM
Overall Length 11-1/4″ 11-3/8″
Net Weight 5.7 lbs. 7.3 lbs.
Power Type Corded Corded
Two-Blade Cutter Head
Spring-Loaded Stand
Die-Cast Aluminum Housing
Includes Planer Blade
Includes Socket Wrench
Includes Guide Rule
Includes Blade Gauge
Includes Tool Case

Key Differences

Here’s a list of these hand planers’ key differences.

Amp Values

The Makita KP0810 wins in this area, with an amp rating of 7.5. In comparison, the KP0800K has an amp rating of 6.5. According to sources, a higher amp rating is better. Amp is not a gauge of a tool’s power, but rather its motors ability to cool itself.

Planing Depth

The Makita KP0810 wins again in this area. Based on available data, it has a planing depth of 5/32″.

No-Load Speed

With 17,000 RPM, the Makita KP0800K has a better RPM rating than the KP0810.

Weight

The Makita KP0810 is heavier by more than 1.5 lbs.

Tool Case

The Makita KP0800K has a tool case, but the KP0810 does not.

Also Read: Ryobi P523 vs P524 Jig Saw Comparison Report

Our Final Word: Makita KP0800K vs KP0810

The Makita KP0810 is heavier than the KP0800K, but it has better amperage and planing depth values. Obviously, these feature help with the tool’s durability and by providing you with better finishes.

The Makita KP0800K, on the other hand, has also something to offer. It’s lighter and it comes with a tool case. Best of all, it has more speed.